Skip to main content

My Divisive History of Annotations

     Early on in high school—freshman or sophomore year, I cannot remember—I had a well-intentioned but overbearing English teacher who forced a certain way of annotating. Every book, essay, or article we read had to be annotated in highlighter and pencil, and we had to highlight a certain number of ideas per page and meet a threshold of notes per page. I am sure he was only trying to ensure annotation became second nature, however, the rules with which he did that only drew contempt for annotation. Annotation is a deeply personal and individual way of analysis, and the method one uses has to be special to them. Without the freedom to do so and assignment of meeting annotation thresholds, I started a bad habit of highlighting an idea because I needed to for an assignment rather than because I viewed it as important.

    Later in high school I was granted the freedom to annotate in a way the best suited me, and I finally saw the value in taking extensive notes within the margins of pages. Now, I rarely read a physical book without extensively annotating it. I generally use a combination of highlighters and pen—it's a tad chaotic but it goes something like this: I highlight important ideas, underline and highlight very important ideas, then I circle it if I really want to identify it, then the final level is to draw a little exclamation mark next to the text. I try to write a small comment next to the text on everything I highlight—so my margins are generally full of chaotic writing. 

Comments

  1. Hey Noah! I had a similar experience in high school with an english teacher who required us students to annotate a certain way. Unfortunately, it lead to annotating too quickly and without enough consideration of why I was emphasizing the ideas that I did. I'm so happy that you've since found an annotation method that works for you! The little exclamation marks sound like an especially nice touch.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I can relate, Noah! I think we must have all had the same teacher in some form. I can remember specifically highlighting ideas because I needed to reach some arbitrary number of notes per page, and I hated it. Your method of annotation is fairly similar to mine; I enjoy writing in the margin and underlining ideas that stick out to me. Nothing beats the sense of physically marking a book or the satisfaction of filling it with your own interpretations. That is, in my opinion, the essence of reading- to have a discussion with the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Noah, I can absolutely relate to your experience. During my sophomore year, I had an American Literature teacher who graded our class engagement based on the number of annotations we had for short stories we read. Whether I deemed it important or not, I must've highlighted or underlined at least a third of the text in each of the short stories.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Antigone vs. Home Fire

What stood out to me at the beginning of Antigone was the parallel fight between Ismene vs. Antigone and Isma vs. Aneeka. Ismene—like Isma—took the logical stance of conservative protection, opting to sacrifice a proper burial of her already dead brother for the safety of the two living sisters. Both Ismene and Isma sacrifice a level of their integrity for the larger picture, knowing they would like to fulfill their religious obligation to bury their brother as they are supposed to. But at the same time, knowing that adherence to their beliefs would be detrimental to their lives. They both choose to look towards the future and what their—and Antigone/Aneeka's—lives could hold if they do the socially expected outcome of not properly burying their brother. They choose to avoid conflict in the name of safety.  Whereas both Antigone and Aneeks cannot continue their lives if they sacrifice their integrity to abide by social pressures. Both of their lives are so dependent on faith and fa...

Gender in Pachinko

 The female characters' intellect is more subtle and transactions: for example, bargaining at the pawnshop and market. Society does not allow women to express and pursue their education and intellect explicitly, but Lee does a good job of making it clear that—even though society disagrees—these women are incredibly intelligent and capable. Nonetheless, they are still disadvantaged by society because of their gender—Sunja gets pregnant out of wedlock and is pressured to leave her home and family in Korea in order to 1) marry someone, so she doesn't get judged, and 2) have someone to provide for her. A lot of the social pressures she faces are based on the gender expectations society has for her. She is not supposed to be/encouraged to be smart or to pursue an education, instead her social expectations are that of a mother. In contrast, men are revered for their intellect, wealth, and power. Hansu is rich and powerful, so we see him attempt to use his influence to control those a...

Final Project Update

My research for my final project has not really officially started, although I have started doing some brainstorming on potential topics that I would like to write about. At mid-quarter, it can be challenging to envision the final project, especially when have only been in class for a short time because of the quarter system. Also, we still have a book and a half to read, which will influence my research and help me develop new ideas. And seeing how other people start/plan to start their projects will help me navigate my own.  As for questions or struggles, at this stage, I am mostly worried about figuring out the focus or direction of my project. I have not yet chosen a platform to use, however, depending on the specific topic I choose, I really liked the interface of StoryMap. I think it portrayed the text and map better than Neatline. If I have a final topic that uses geography, I will definitely consider using StoryMap. Overall, I feel a little overwhelmed and unsure at this st...